Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
IDCases ; 29: e01536, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1983161

RESUMEN

Purpose: To describe a novel case of marginal keratitis following COVID 19 vaccination. Methods: Case report. Results: A 68-year-old female received the Moderna COVID 19 vaccine. She then developed ocular irritation and peripheral corneal opacities that are characteristic of marginal keratitis. Her symptoms responded well to steroid and antibiotic ophthalmic medications. She received her second dose of the Moderna vaccine while still taking her eye drops and was then able to taper off her drops without a recurrence of symptoms. Conclusions: Marginal keratitis represents a localized type III hypersensitivity reaction of the cornea. The SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID 19 gains entry into the cell via binding of the spike protein with the ACE2 receptor. It is this spike protein that is the target for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, such as the Moderna vaccine, allowing spike protein antigen recognition by the human immune system. The cornea has been found to have significant levels of ACE2 receptors, potentially allowing for the cornea to become a site for the antigen-antibody complex deposition necessary for a type III hypersensitivity response. This reaction should be recognized so that treatment may be provided during the initial episode and the cornea may be monitored following subsequent vaccinations.

2.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 35(4): 695-707, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1963338

RESUMEN

This study aimed to help determine the effect of dietary supplements on symptom course and quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection. DESIGN: We modified the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS) to conduct a 3 arm, parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms of COVID-19 infection. Patients took placebo (n = 34), vitamin C 1000 mg (n = 32), or melatonin 10 mg (n = 32) orally for 14 days. OUTCOMES: Ninety Eight (98 out of 104 recruited; mean age = 52 years) patients completed the study. Outcomes were calculated as differences from baseline scores on each of 2 WURSS-derived surveys and analyzed using a spline regression analysis. Regarding symptom progression, those patients taking placebo and vitamin C progressed at the same rate. When compared with those taking placebo (coefficient = -1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.39 to -0.8) the group taking melatonin had a faster resolution of symptoms (coefficient = -0.63 [95% CI -1.02 to -0.21] P = .003). By day 14 all 3 groups had reached plateau.Quality-of-life impact analysis demonstrated that the group taking vitamin C improved at the same rate as the group taking placebo (coefficient = -0.71 (95% CI = -1.11 to -0.3)). The group taking melatonin (coefficient = -1.16 (95% CI = -1.75 to - 0.57) P < .005) had a faster improvement in quality-of-life. By day 14 all 3 groups had reached plateau. CONCLUSION: Vitamin C 1000 mg once daily has no effect on disease progression. Melatonin 10 mg daily may have a statistically significant effect but it is unclear if this represents a clinically significant benefit to those with mild-to-moderate symptoms of COVID-19 infection. Further study is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Melatonina , Ácido Ascórbico/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Melatonina/efectos adversos , Melatonina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA